Dependable Erection

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Climate change - where's the debate?

Scientists beg for climate action
For the first time, more than 200 of the world's leading climate scientists, losing their patience, urged government leaders to take radical action to slow global warming because "there is no time to lose."

A petition from at least 215 climate scientists calls for the world to cut in half greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. It is directed at a conference of diplomats meeting in Bali, Indonesia, to negotiate the next global warming treaty. The petition, obtained by The Associated Press, is to be announced at a press conference there Wednesday night.

The appeal from scientists follows a petition last week from more than 150 global business leaders also demanding the 50 percent cut in greenhouse gases. That is the estimate that scientists calculate would hold future global warming to a little more than a 3-degree Fahrenheit increase and is in line with what the European Union has adopted.

In the past, many of these scientists have avoided calls for action, leaving that to environmental advocacy groups. That dispassionate stance was taken during the release this year of four separate reports by the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

But no more.

"It's a grave crisis, and we need to do something real fast," said petition signer Jeff Severinghaus, a geosciences professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif. "I think the stakes are way way too high to be playing around."

If you get your news from the Herald-Sun and the John Locke Foundation, you'd never know this.

UPDATE: To be fair, the N&O links to the same lighthearted dismissal of the climate change conference as the HS does. Neither of them devote any space to discussing the substance of the conference.



  • Giving rebuttal time to anti-climate change spin doctors is what's taking up all the bandwidth on this topic.

    Neither side can get any traction (although the anti-change group benefits most from this), so nothing gets done.

    Why didn't the mainstream media give The Flat Earth Society equal time during the moon landings?

    Why didn't the media give equal time to racists during the civil rights movement?

    Too many news outlets are owned or partially owned or have money invested in the anti-climate change lobby.

    So I guess we're f**ked.

    Buy some property in Goldsboro--that's where beachfront will be in a few decades.

    By Blogger Tony, at 8:06 PM  

  • sorry - poorly written headline. i was trying to say that the ostriches at JLF and other entities like them don't deserve a place at the table when it comes to talking about climate change, yet our local media gives them as much space as the entire scientific community.

    i'll be hiring a headline writer who speaks English real soon now.

    By Blogger Barry Ragin, at 5:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home