Dependable Erection

Monday, August 04, 2008

Click Here for to see the full picture


Think of the children.



  • oh dear--is it actually nekkid?

    By Blogger Vera, at 3:49 PM  

  • i should say that you need to click to find out, but i'll spoil the surprise.

    no, it's not a nekkid man.

    he has shaved his torso, however. kinda like Cap't Kirk in "The Gamesters of Triskelion."

    By Blogger Barry, at 3:55 PM  

  • Is that anatomically correct?

    By Blogger old.flames, at 4:46 PM  

  • vey iz mir. God forbid little boys should see a man who exercises and doesn't eat pulled pork, RC cola, or moonpies. Clearly they will have self-esteem issues.

    By Blogger dcrollins, at 6:01 PM  

  • And the grammar. Think of the grammar!

    By Blogger Barry, at 6:05 PM  

  • ah, the elusive "muscle"

    sorry, was too risky to click at work. lol your daughters can grow up thinking they have to look like those massive banners in the Victoria's Secret window, but this is too much for your boys? Are they not men?

    By Blogger Vera, at 8:50 PM  

  • The things people will get enough riled up about to picket.

    By Blogger Valerie at We Love Durham, at 8:58 PM  

  • I clicked through and I'm not sure what's obscene or even inappropriate about this image.

    As another commenter said, how this is any more risque than the mid-riff baring women in A&F ads I don't know.

    By Blogger Seth, at 9:15 PM  

  • I think it's pressure teenage boys into thinking they've got to trim everything. Oy, indeed.

    By Blogger toastie, at 12:48 AM  

  • "...we want all sexually explicit pictures in the windows..."

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    By Blogger Dan S., at 12:24 PM  

  • This is why I firmly support the mandatory wear of Hijabs -- by both women and men in public. It's been biblically documented that the mere sight of a woman's ankle (or worse yet, earlobe) has the power to overwhelm the menfolk into a frenzy. (Hence the not-so-Secret orgies that plagued the sexually liberated Victorian era.)

    Similarly, I find it suitably unsuitable to be able to see the patch of dirty-icky, taught, luminous, supple, glistening skin somewhat above someone's "special place" -- so much so, that I don't even look at mine -- they're dirty and icky). I do, however support the practice of self-flagellation, for even thinking about "special places" -- mine, or anyone else's. (Oh, how I love a good self-flagellation.)

    Did I mention that, due to childhood brain injuries and good Quiverfull line-breeding, I have an IQ somewhere in the mid-30's? I don't know if it's relevant, but I thought I'd mention it.

    Let me just stare at that photo, one more time, just to make sure that it's icky. Yup. Oh dear, time for some flagellation! Yippee!

    By Blogger Dan S., at 12:40 PM  

  • BTW, I should mention that given the absolute lack of contact/attribution on the site, and the patently false information in the WHOIS lookup, the petition is likely a desperate attempt to get emails from gullible, "heartland values" puritans.
    Also, enjoy the subtext of a few key words and phrases:
    * thick skin
    * exposed
    * It is so large

    By Blogger Dan S., at 2:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home