Municipal election update
Mayoral candidate Thomas Stith showed off his deep pockets yesterday by dropping an 11 x 17 slick brochure to an unknown number of households.
Local political activist and former City Council member Frank Hyman was one of those whose household received the mailing. His reaction on a local listserv was pretty quick:
Here's a scan of the brochure.
Frank also speculated that Stith was mailing this anti-crime piece to white males, but i'm not so sure. Soon-to-be Mrs. Dependable also received one in her name at out house, and last night i was door-to-door delivering our quarterly neighborhood newsletter, and saw several of these brochures in mailboxes belonging to someof my African American neighbors. I think it's more likely he's dropping this to small business owners and/or a list associated with the Chamber of Commerce.
Anyway, Frank's knowledge of Durham politics is much more extensive than mine, so i'll take him at his word that this kind of thing is relatively unknown in Durham.
That said, it didn't strike me as particularly outrageous, but maybe that's a statement on the current nature of our political discourse more than anything else. I think, though, that Stith is walking a fine line.
Stith has been on Council since 1999. It's pretty hard to blame the Mayor, who is under Durham's charter simply the presiding officer at Council meetings, and not the head of the executive branch, for Durham's problems without having to accept some of that blame himself. Additionally, it seems like half of Stith's campaign is designed to give the impression that he's the incumbent. He probably doesn't want to make Durham seem like a terrible, scary place, if he's going to be running as someone who's got some responsibility for that.
And then there's the whole issue of this kind of a negative campaign. How will Durham voters respond? Stay tuned.
UPDATE: There was some discussion in the comments about exactly where the names that Stith dropped the flier to came from. I said that my information indicated the names could not have come from a voter registration list. It turns out i was interpreting that information incorrectly. I don't know where the names came from, but a voter registration list is not ruled out.
Sorry about that.
Local political activist and former City Council member Frank Hyman was one of those whose household received the mailing. His reaction on a local listserv was pretty quick:
The [brochure] crosses a line that hasn't been crossed in Durham to my knowledge. Stith uses 3 grossly unflattering pics of Bill Bell as a Karl Rove way to influence voters.
Here's a scan of the brochure.
Frank also speculated that Stith was mailing this anti-crime piece to white males, but i'm not so sure. Soon-to-be Mrs. Dependable also received one in her name at out house, and last night i was door-to-door delivering our quarterly neighborhood newsletter, and saw several of these brochures in mailboxes belonging to someof my African American neighbors. I think it's more likely he's dropping this to small business owners and/or a list associated with the Chamber of Commerce.
Anyway, Frank's knowledge of Durham politics is much more extensive than mine, so i'll take him at his word that this kind of thing is relatively unknown in Durham.
That said, it didn't strike me as particularly outrageous, but maybe that's a statement on the current nature of our political discourse more than anything else. I think, though, that Stith is walking a fine line.
Stith has been on Council since 1999. It's pretty hard to blame the Mayor, who is under Durham's charter simply the presiding officer at Council meetings, and not the head of the executive branch, for Durham's problems without having to accept some of that blame himself. Additionally, it seems like half of Stith's campaign is designed to give the impression that he's the incumbent. He probably doesn't want to make Durham seem like a terrible, scary place, if he's going to be running as someone who's got some responsibility for that.
And then there's the whole issue of this kind of a negative campaign. How will Durham voters respond? Stay tuned.
UPDATE: There was some discussion in the comments about exactly where the names that Stith dropped the flier to came from. I said that my information indicated the names could not have come from a voter registration list. It turns out i was interpreting that information incorrectly. I don't know where the names came from, but a voter registration list is not ruled out.
Sorry about that.
Labels: 27701, Durham, local politics
8 Comments:
I got it too -- I was guessing it was just a mass mail drop.
By Unknown, at 11:40 AM
There was definitely some selectivity in the names. I'm not sure what, though.
It wasn't addressed to "voter" or "household", but to specific individuals. And different people have, you know, ways of tracking down which names they give out to which organizations.
For example, my name is misspelled on one of my automobile registrations, but not the other, and it's misspelled in an unusual way. Whenever i get a marketing piece addressed to that spelling, i know where they got the list from.
I've gotten info from people who have similar situations that leads me to believe this mailing went out to a particular list.
By Barry, at 11:46 AM
perhaps it went to registered and active democrats within precints in which he has had a particularly high turn-out in past years. It came to me, but not my newly registered partner. Generally, the voter lists you're going to get are divided into precints.
It actually reminded me a lot of the ads that the NC Dems put out honestly. I have about 400 political ads from around the south post 2001 if you're interested in comparisons.
By Natalie, at 2:18 PM
i would certainly be interested in comparing this to earlier ads, especially those from municipal, rather than partisan, elections. But those would be worthwhile looking at as well.
email me at DependableErection AT gmail DOT com
as far as the list source goes, as i've indicated, i have a particular sample that was mailed to a name that could not have been gotten from a voter list. Not that the source of the names is a particularly big deal at this point. More a matter of curiousity than anything else.
Soon-to-be-Mrs. Dependable got one; i didn't. We're both registered dems. I'm a precinct chair, she is not. I'm probably a bit more active in the party than she is.
Unless Stith's strategy was to get people talking about the ad itself, rather than his message, i don't see why he would target dems.
By Barry, at 2:31 PM
Just based on the genealogy of the Stith campaign, I wouldn't be surprised if it came out of a John Locke Foundation voter database.
As for the content, Stith's proposals boil down to basically four things:
* "Get tough" rhetoric.
* Increases in police officers, which he has never championed in 8 years as a commissioner.
* Promises of tougher prosecution, which the Mayor's office has no control over.
* Intervention programs, where Bell has done more than just about any other politician.
I'm not a huge Bill Bell fan, but when the alternative is Thomas Stith, I don't have a moment's hesitation in supporting him.
By Unknown, at 4:19 PM
Er, I called Stith a "commissioner" in that last comment. I meant "councilor," obviously...
By Unknown, at 4:20 PM
No Stith flyers here in 27704 (Northgate Park).
What's Stith's motivation?
He's spending an awful lot of money on an office that seems to have more ceremonial and "bully pulpit" clout than political?
Kind of like the Mayor of Townsville?
http://www.cartoon-secrets.com/Photos/PowerPuffGirlsMayor.jpg
By Tony, at 9:49 PM
I've received two slick mailers from Stith's campaign in the last month, one being the "Bill Bell doesn't have a clue" nonsense. The first one had pictures of him with his wife and kids. I found his daughter's names (Kara, Kira, Kia) to be the most interesting part for two reasons: one, their first initials spell out "KKK," and two, they all sound alike. Someone with decision-making skills poor enough to give his three daughters essentially the same name doesn't belong in the city's highest office. Just one man's opinion.
By Anonymous, at 9:40 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home